Skip to content

Estate Tax

The federal estate tax is a tax on the transfer of property at death, paid by the estate rather than by the people who inherit. Because each person can pass $15,000,000 free of it, it reaches a very small share of estates, and the scheduled cut to that figure after 2025 was repealed rather than postponed.

Last reviewed by Steven Fox, CFP®, EA on

Quick Summary

  • It is paid by the executor out of the estate before anything is distributed, so a beneficiary does not receive a bill for it.
  • Each decedent can transfer $15,000,000 free of tax, and the amount above the exclusion is taxed at rates reaching 40%.
  • The "exemption" is really a credit. Section 2010 grants a credit equal to the tax on an exclusion amount, which is why the figure behaves like a threshold rather than a deduction.
  • The filing threshold is not the exclusion. A return is required when the gross estate exceeds the exclusion, measured before any deduction, and lifetime taxable gifts push that threshold down.
  • Many estates that owe nothing should still file, because a surviving spouse can only inherit the unused exclusion if a return elects it.

Definition

The federal estate tax is, in the IRS's own phrase, "a tax on your right to transfer property at your death." It is computed on the whole of what a person owned or controlled at death, reduced by debts, administration expenses and transfers to a spouse or to charity, and then offset by a credit large enough to eliminate the tax on all but very substantial estates. Section 2002 states who pays it: "the tax imposed by this chapter shall be paid by the executor." The return is Form 706, the "United States Estate (and Generation-Skipping Transfer) Tax Return."

The vocabulary is worth untangling, because the word people use is not the word the statute uses. Nearly everyone calls the sheltered amount an exemption. Section 2010 instead grants an "applicable credit amount," defined as the tentative tax that would be due on an "applicable exclusion amount." The applicable exclusion amount is the basic exclusion amount, currently $15,000,000, plus, for a surviving spouse, any exclusion the first spouse to die did not use. Describing it as a credit is not pedantry: it is the reason the figure functions as an all-or-nothing threshold rather than reducing the taxable estate.

Advanced Explanation

The scheduled halving after 2025 did not happen, and it was repealed rather than deferred. The doubled exclusion enacted in 2017 was written to fall by roughly half for 2026, and years of planning content was built around using it before it disappeared. Section 70106 of the 2025 tax law removed the temporary increase, set a new flat statutory figure, and reset the inflation base year, so section 2010(c)(3) now simply states the basic exclusion amount as a fixed number with indexing beginning for calendar year 2027. Any article urging action before an imminent sunset is describing law that no longer exists.

How the tax is actually computed, which explains several things that look strange. Start with the gross estate, which is broader than the probate estate: it includes life insurance the decedent owned or controlled, retirement accounts, jointly held property, and property in a revocable trust, none of which goes through probate. Subtract debts, funeral and administration expenses, the unlimited marital deduction for property passing to a surviving spouse, and the charitable deduction. The result is the taxable estate. Section 2001(b) then computes a tentative tax on the taxable estate plus the decedent's post-1976 adjusted taxable gifts, subtracts gift tax already payable on those gifts, and the applicable credit is applied against the result. Two consequences follow from that add-back. Lifetime gifting and death-time transfers draw on one allowance rather than two. And only the appreciation after a gift escapes, since the gift is added back at its value when made.

The filing threshold is a separate rule from the exclusion, and this is the most frequently missed mechanic on the page. Section 6018(a)(1) requires a return where the gross estate exceeds the basic exclusion amount in effect for the year of death. Gross, not taxable: an estate with substantial debt or a large marital bequest can owe nothing and still be required to file. And section 6018(a)(3) reduces that threshold by "the amount of the adjusted taxable gifts made by the decedent after December 31, 1976," so a lifetime gifting program lowers the level at which a return becomes mandatory. A separate and much lower threshold of $60,000 applies under section 6018(a)(2) to the US-situated estate of someone who was neither a citizen nor a resident. Section 6075(a) sets the deadline: the return "shall be filed within 9 months after the date of the decedent's death," with a six-month extension available on request.

Portability, and the fix for the election everyone misses. A surviving spouse may add the deceased spousal unused exclusion to their own, which is what allows a married couple to shelter twice the basic exclusion amount without any trust drafting. It is not automatic. Section 2010(c)(5)(A) requires the election on a timely filed estate tax return, and the election is irrevocable; section 2010(c)(4)(A) caps the transferred amount at the basic exclusion amount, and (c)(4)(B)(i) takes it only from the last deceased spouse, so remarriage can displace it. The trap is obvious in hindsight: the estates that most need portability are the ones small enough to assume no return was needed. Revenue Procedure 2022-32 answers it, granting a simplified late election "on or before the fifth anniversary of the decedent's date of death" for estates that were not otherwise required to file under section 6018(a). So a missed election is often fixable for five years, which makes checking it one of the more valuable things a surviving spouse can do.

Three things the estate tax is regularly confused with. It is not probate. Probate is a state court process establishing who has authority to transfer a decedent's property, and it applies to estates of any size; the estate tax is a federal tax question about whether a transfer is taxed, and the two have almost nothing to do with each other. It is not an inheritance tax: an estate tax is levied on the estate, while an inheritance tax is levied on the recipient with the rate typically depending on how closely related they were. And it is not the income tax. Receiving an inheritance is not income, but what you inherited determines what happens next: a pre-tax retirement account carries the original owner's deferred income tax with it, while appreciated property is generally revalued at death so the accumulated gain is never income-taxed.

State death taxes are the more realistic exposure for most families, and they are independent of the federal rules. A minority of states levy their own estate tax, several at thresholds far below the federal one, so an estate comfortably clear of federal tax can owe state tax. A few levy an inheritance tax instead, and the two are not alternatives: at least one state levies both, which is why "some states tax the estate and others tax the recipient instead" is a tidy taxonomy that fails on the hardest case. Nor is close family automatically exempt from an inheritance tax, though rates for children and siblings are generally lower than for unrelated recipients. Thresholds and rates change with legislative sessions, so a state revenue department is the source worth checking rather than a national article.

The generation-skipping transfer tax, in one clause, because it is routinely over-dramatized. It is a separate tax on transfers that skip a generation, and its exemption is tied by section 2631(c) to the same basic exclusion amount, so it reaches as few families as the estate tax does. It also does not catch the commonest case people worry about: under section 2651(e) a grandchild whose own parent has already died moves up a generation, so inheriting in place of a deceased parent is not a skip.

How to Remember

Two separate questions, and people merge them. Does the estate owe anything? Only above a very large exclusion. Does it have to file? That turns on the gross estate before deductions, reduced by lifetime gifts, and on whether a surviving spouse wants the unused exclusion. Plenty of estates answer no to the first and yes to the second.

Used in a Sentence

“Their attorney filed an estate tax return for Elena's father even though no estate tax was due, so that her mother could carry forward his unused exclusion.”

How It Works

The computation, step by step, with the filing test kept separate from the tax itself.

  1. Value the gross estate at the date of death, or at an alternate valuation date six months later where an election applies. This includes assets that avoid probate entirely, such as retirement accounts, life insurance the decedent owned, jointly titled property and revocable trust assets.

  2. Subtract the deductions: debts, funeral and administration expenses, property passing to a surviving spouse, and charitable bequests. The result is the taxable estate.

  3. Add back post-1976 adjusted taxable gifts and compute the tentative tax on the total, then subtract gift tax already payable.

  4. Apply the applicable credit, which is the tax on the basic exclusion amount plus any exclusion inherited from a deceased spouse. Whatever remains is the tax, at rates reaching 40%.

  5. File within nine months if a return is required, and file deliberately even if it is not where portability matters.

A hypothetical example of the filing test, which is where the surprises are. Assume a decedent whose gross estate is $6,000,000, consisting of a house, a brokerage account and a retirement account, and whose debts and administration expenses total $1,500,000. The taxable estate is therefore $4,500,000, but the filing test under section 6018(a)(1) is measured on the $6,000,000 gross figure, so the debts do not help with the question of whether a return is required.

Now add lifetime gifting. If the same decedent had made $3,000,000 of adjusted taxable gifts during life, section 6018(a)(3) reduces the filing threshold by that $3,000,000. The gifts also come back into the tax computation under section 2001(b). Neither the gifting nor the debt changes the essential outcome for an estate this size, which is that no federal estate tax is due, because the exclusion is far larger than the taxable estate. What changes is whether the executor has a filing obligation, and the answer depends on figures the family may not think to assemble.

Pros and Cons

What the current structure means for most families

  • The exclusion is large enough that federal estate tax is not the operative concern for the overwhelming majority of estates, which frees planning to focus on titling, beneficiary forms and incapacity.
  • It is now permanent and indexed rather than scheduled to fall, so plans do not have to be built around a deadline.
  • The unlimited marital deduction means nothing is owed on the first death of a married couple, whatever the size of the estate.
  • Portability lets a couple shelter two exclusions without specialized trust drafting, provided the election is made.
  • The income tax side is unusually favorable: property revalued at death passes without income tax on a lifetime of accumulated gain.

Where families still get caught

  • The filing threshold is measured on the gross estate before deductions and is reduced by lifetime taxable gifts, so a return can be required by an estate that owes nothing.
  • Portability requires an affirmative election on a filed return, and the estates most likely to miss it are exactly those that assume no return is needed. Missing it costs a second exclusion, and the simplified fix runs out after five years.
  • State estate and inheritance taxes reach much further down and are independent of each other and of the federal rules, so a move across a state line is a reason to re-read a plan.
  • The gross estate includes life insurance and retirement accounts that never see probate, so a family can badly underestimate the total by looking at the will.
  • Gifting during life is added back into the computation, so it removes future growth rather than the value given away, and it costs the recipient the basis step-up.

People Also Asked

Answers to the most frequently asked questions.

Who actually pays the federal estate tax?
The estate does, through the executor. Section 2002 provides that the tax "shall be paid by the executor," so it comes out of estate assets before anything is distributed and beneficiaries do not receive a bill. That is the structural difference from a state inheritance tax, which is levied on the recipient and where the rate often depends on how closely related they were to the decedent. Receiving an inheritance is separately not income for federal income tax purposes.
What is the difference between estate tax and inheritance tax?
Who is taxed. An estate tax is levied on the estate as a whole before distribution; an inheritance tax is levied on each recipient, usually at a rate that depends on their relationship to the decedent. There is a federal estate tax and no federal inheritance tax. At the state level a minority of states levy an estate tax, a few levy an inheritance tax, and the two are independent rather than alternatives, so at least one state levies both. Being a child or a sibling does not automatically mean exemption from a state inheritance tax, though the rates for close family are generally lower.
Should we file an estate tax return even if no tax is due?
Often yes, and portability is the main reason. A surviving spouse can add the first spouse's unused exclusion to their own, but only if an estate tax return is filed making the election, and the election is irrevocable once made. It is also worth checking whether a return is mandatory regardless, since the threshold is measured on the gross estate before debts and is reduced by lifetime taxable gifts. If the election was missed, Revenue Procedure 2022-32 allows a simplified late election up to the fifth anniversary of the death for estates that were not otherwise required to file.
Did the estate tax exclusion get cut in half after 2025?
No. The doubled exclusion enacted in 2017 was scheduled to fall by roughly half for 2026, and the 2025 tax law prevented that by setting a higher flat statutory figure, removing the temporary-increase provision and resetting the inflation base year. The exclusion is now $15,000,000 per person and is indexed for inflation from 2027. Planning material written on the assumption that the larger exclusion had to be used before it vanished rests on a premise that no longer holds.
What is the difference between estate tax and probate?
They answer different questions and the size of the estate is relevant to only one of them. Probate is a state court process that establishes who has authority to collect and transfer a decedent's property, gives creditors a window to make claims, and authorizes distribution. It applies to modest estates as readily as large ones, and it reaches only property with no other route out, so beneficiary designations and jointly titled assets bypass it. Estate tax is a federal question about whether a transfer is taxed, and it is computed on a much broader pool that includes the assets probate never touches.

Have a question a definition can't answer?

Advice-only advisors answer questions like this for a transparent flat fee — no products, no commissions, no asset management.

Find an Advisor